he asked me what relation article 1191 had to the case and, me, thinking it had to be responsive to the question, answered purely the ratio on 1191. i forgot to mention that the parties expressly stipulated in their agreement that the contract could be rescinded. he called rosie then yen who got it right. it's unfair because i knew he answer if only he had asked me. but i guess my face was reading as if that's all i knew. the only thing more frustrating than being called and not being able to answer anything is being called, not being able to answer anything, but you knew full well the correct answer. to add insult to injury, farah had to raise her hand and say what i said was wrong. thanks, girl. strike two. why you gotta do me like that. remind me not to help her out again because what she's doing, intentionally or not, is just making me look bad.
sigh. third time's the charm.
No comments:
Post a Comment